Author Topic: Average finish time at NYCM was 3:32 in 1980 -- in 2008 it was 4:16  (Read 2229 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline rehammes

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 159
  • Karma: 2
Re: Average finish time at NYCM was 3:32 in 1980 -- in 2008 it was 4:16
« Reply #15 on: October 30, 2009, 05:25:28 PM »
In what other sport, major or minor, is there such a push to be as inclusive as possible of the uncompetitive types in competitive contests in a capacity beyond spectating or officiating? 


Golf? 

Offline Andrew A.

  • NDCQ
  • Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1476
  • Karma: 15
  • It is simple, but not easy.
    • Distance Running Observer
Re: Average finish time at NYCM was 3:32 in 1980 -- in 2008 it was 4:16
« Reply #16 on: October 30, 2009, 06:52:52 PM »
In any and every prize money tourney?
Why dink around? Go for it, be the best. It is worth whatever risk there is even if you fall short. You will be better.
‎"There is no such thing as an overachiever. We are all underachievers to varying degrees." - John Wooden.

Online Ryan

  • Just another crazy runner
  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 7964
  • Karma: 11
  • 2011 Walleye Run
    • Hillrunner.com
Re: Average finish time at NYCM was 3:32 in 1980 -- in 2008 it was 4:16
« Reply #17 on: October 30, 2009, 08:45:07 PM »
I don't see many amateurs swinging away on the PGA Tour.
"Biased one-sided training with an overemphasis on one component or quality is one of the biggest causes of injuries today." - Vern Gambetta

Check out the Running News Network!

Offline rehammes

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 159
  • Karma: 2
Re: Average finish time at NYCM was 3:32 in 1980 -- in 2008 it was 4:16
« Reply #18 on: October 30, 2009, 08:50:54 PM »
Not to belabor the point, but with the exception of the major tours that receive press coverage, there is a venue for players of any ability to play competitive golf via club tourneys, municipal tourneys, corporate outings, or any of the countless 'mini-tours' that exist much like the opportunities that runners of any ability have to compete.  The 20+ handicappers may not have the opportunity to compete head-to-head against the world's greatest, but they can certainly play the same tracks.  Then again, only the bet of the best can compete in the Olympic running events.  I don't want to split hairs, but the two sports seem somewhat similar.

I would rather focus on the benefits made available by the explosion in popularity of running.  Any body type of runner can find a comfortable pair of shoes or clothing at an affordable price.  Runners in any metropolitan area can find a competition at the last minute giving them an opportunity to hone their skills.  The socially conscious runner can use the sport as an avenue for charitable giving.  I think that those who consider themselves competitive in the sport chose their level of participation carefully to avoid some of the pitfalls of 'Charity-Name-Here-5k-Run/Walk' and instead focus on the races with the reputation of providing a theater for competitive running.  I'm sure we would like for every event to be a contest amongst the best, but if there were not so many 'to-do-listers' and charitable souls anxious to try their hands, then there wouldn't be so many contests available to us all.

I think the free market of the running community is speaking, through discussions like this, that there is absolutely a demand for competitive races that focus on the sport rather than the t-shirt and free bananas. I don't want to speculate on the motivations of any other runner I line up against, they are his/her own.  If it is a life's to-do list, they has no effect on me. I wonder if the sky-diving or bungee-jumping community has a similar distaste for those who partake just to experience it once.  Does a foursome of scratch golfers have a conversation like this about the hacks that get all the late-morning, weekend  tee-times, or do they just play at other times or courses.  If some chose to participate, with what we would consider to be inadequate preparation, I guess that is their choice.  I am sure that there is a direct correlation between their level of preparedness and the experience they garner.  I think it will be interesting to see if the children of this generation of marathon participants takes an interest in the sport at a much younger age than their parents, and if so, will that result in a much more talented US running community?  

.....just a few scattered thoughts.....




Offline Andrew A.

  • NDCQ
  • Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1476
  • Karma: 15
  • It is simple, but not easy.
    • Distance Running Observer
Re: Average finish time at NYCM was 3:32 in 1980 -- in 2008 it was 4:16
« Reply #19 on: October 30, 2009, 11:22:48 PM »
I don't want to speculate on the motivations of any other runner I line up against, they are his/her own.  If it is a life's to-do list, they has no effect on me. I wonder if the sky-diving or bungee-jumping community has a similar distaste for those who partake just to experience it once.  Does a foursome of scratch golfers have a conversation like this about the hacks that get all the late-morning, weekend  tee-times, or do they just play at other times or courses.  If some chose to participate, with what we would consider to be inadequate preparation, I guess that is their choice.  I am sure that there is a direct correlation between their level of preparedness and the experience they garner.  I think it will be interesting to see if the children of this generation of marathon participants takes an interest in the sport at a much younger age than their parents, and if so, will that result in a much more talented US running community?
Perhaps if those scratch golfers saw tee times fill up 2-4 times as quickly, requiring scheduling tee times 4+ months in advance rather than 1-3 weeks in advance, along with greens fees doubling over the course of a decade or two then they might speculate as to the cause (increased demand from a flood uncompetitive golfers?).  Same if the wait and cost both saw exponential growth in bungee-jumping and skydiving.  If that is not happening in those sports/activities then that is likely where marked contrast lies between them and marathon running, the impacts on long-time participants differ significantly.  It might mean nothing to people who are well off enough to think almost nothing of devoting $100+ to an entry for something that is months away and might wind up being for naught if injury strikes within that timespan, but it does mean something to the budget-conscious would-be participants/competitors with performance goals. 
« Last Edit: November 01, 2009, 11:47:05 AM by Andrew A. »
Why dink around? Go for it, be the best. It is worth whatever risk there is even if you fall short. You will be better.
‎"There is no such thing as an overachiever. We are all underachievers to varying degrees." - John Wooden.

Online Ryan

  • Just another crazy runner
  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 7964
  • Karma: 11
  • 2011 Walleye Run
    • Hillrunner.com
Re: Average finish time at NYCM was 3:32 in 1980 -- in 2008 it was 4:16
« Reply #20 on: November 01, 2009, 11:18:15 AM »
From what I've seen, it's not an exaggeration to even talk about fees tripling or quadrupling over the course of a decade.
"Biased one-sided training with an overemphasis on one component or quality is one of the biggest causes of injuries today." - Vern Gambetta

Check out the Running News Network!

Tags:
 


Hillrunner.com ] [ Online Running Coach ] [ Arthur Lydiard ] [ Articles ] [ Calculators ] [ Calendar ] [ Forums ] [ Links ] [ Pictures ] [ Polls ] [ Race Coverage ] [ Running News ] [ Store ] [ Training ] [ Training Log ] [ Hillrunner.com RSS ]
All contents of this site ©1999-2012 Hillrunner.com