Lest I come across as a hater, I do read content from RW, though it is essentially restricted to what comes across via the twitter feeds of Amby Burfoot and Alex Hutchinson (that latter of whom's latest seems a bit of a stretch). I recognize the magazine (as opposed to scholarly journal) genre for what it is, chiefly fluff designed to engender and enable interest in a hobby or lifestyle. I would not expect RW to deviate from this basic premise, certainly not given the recent trends in print media. As a current subscriber to Running Times, I would freely admit that there is plenty of content in that magazine which I routinely skip. At any rate, just reflecting on what I realize as RW's constrictions and what leads the editorial content decisions. It does nothing for me, so obviously I would routinely skip it – I suppose I just do not care what they claim and figure that the audience for such claims is chiefly self-selecting.