Ryan

Obstacles to honesty

This article was originally posted by Ryan at the original HillRunner.com Blogs.

Image

Last week, I posted about the importance of being honest with yourself. The runner I mentioned at the end of that post emailed me a few thoughts on that post. I think they were very good points and I’d like to address them here.

[S]ome runners won’t want to admit to the start of an injury if they think their coach will severely curtail their workout.

Absolutely true. The thing I’d like to stress here is that reducing training load at the onset of an injury is necessary. You can take a relatively small hit now or a much bigger hit later. It’s true that your coach will likely curtail your training load some if you tell your coach about an early stage injury. However, your workload is going to be curtailed much more if you don’t deal with the injury in its early stages and let it become worse.

I suppose if you throw in DM or MRTT, seeing social media posts where your peers are killing their workouts doesn’t help that sinking feeling that you are FALLING BEHIND. Sad truth is that many folks don’t post that they are having nagging aches/pains!

For those who don’t know, DM is a cross between Facebook and a training log. MRTT is a running club with a heavy online component.

As with anywhere that you can share part of the picture without sharing all of it, some people choose to do just that. In some cases, they share the good without sharing the bad, likely in an effort to appear more impressive. I’m sure we all know stories of people who have shared very impressive workouts and looked like they had great training going on, only to end up out of the blue laid up for weeks, if not months, due to some injury. Injuries generally don’t come out of the blue. These people are usually withholding something along the way.

As for that feeling of falling behind, it’s a real thing and I don’t want to discount it. However, again, I’d stress looking at the big picture. Do you want to lose a little ground now or risk losing a lot of ground later? What you lose if you catch a problem in its early stages, before it becomes a full blown injury, will be minimal. What you lose if you wait for it to develop into a full blown injury could be catastrophic. I’d rather take one or two minimal hits than even risk a season ending injury.

That trust and honesty between coach and runner is so important.

While I say something along this line frequently, I couldn’t say it better. If you have a coach, it’s important to not just be honest with yourself but also to be honest with your coach.

In the end, I absolutely get not wanting to share all of those details. And, if you don’t want to publicly on a social website or in a social group, that’s your prerogative. However, you need to be honest with not just yourself but all decision makers in your life. If you are the sole decision maker, it’s critical that you be honest with yourself about how you feel and honestly assess what that means. If you have a coach, it’s just as critical that you are honest and forthcoming with your coach about how you feel. Don’t withhold problems and be honest when your coach asks follow-up questions.

If your coach is worth anything, your coach cares deeply about helping you do the best you can. Your coach wants you to succeed as much as you do. Help your coach help you by being an open book.

If you don’t have a coach, it’s more challenging because you have to not only be honest with yourself but you have to honestly assess what your body’s feedback means. That can be very difficult but it must be done. If it isn’t, you could lose your whole racing season because you decided to run through something when it could have been resolved with a few days off or a skipped workout or long run.

Photo credit: nprpdx, on Flickr

Things that make you faster: bacteria and cursing

This article was originally posted by Ryan at the original HillRunner.com Blogs.

What? Yep, it’s true.

Bacteria

Alex Hutchinson has another good blog. This time on how your body’s "friendly" bacteria appears to make you faster.

A little of what was seen in mice:

So in this case, having "normal" gut bacteria is the best option; having all your gut bacteria wiped out is the worst option; and having at least one gut bacteria is better than nothing. Why? The researchers focus on the possible role of gut bacteria in enhancing the body’s antioxidant response, and they do indeed show that antioxidant activity was reduced in the germ-free mice.

And in humans:

Which brings us back to beet juice, whose key ingredient is nitrate, which is converted by friendly bacteria in the mouth to nitrite, which is then converted to nitric oxide, which is what boosts endurance. In this case, then, it’s your oral microbiome rather than your gut microbiome that matters. There’s already some interesting research from back in 2008 showing that, if you use an antibacterial mouthwash, you completely wipe out the benefits of ingesting nitrate.

Interesting stuff. I’m not going to go out and tell anyone to avoid antibacterial mouthwash but, if you take beet juice for performance benefit, you might want to think about your timing. Further, I’d say we should probably at least be aware of these things. Just don’t go overboard. As mentioned in the end, probiotics aren’t a panacea.

Cursing

No, I’m not encouraging you to run all over the place swearing in front of kids and as you’re passing churches. However, as this old study that someone I follow on Twitter linked to shows, it can help relieve pain if used in moderation.

This article presents further evidence that, for many people, swearing (cursing) provides readily available and effective relief from pain. However, overuse of swearing in everyday situations lessens its effectiveness as a short-term intervention to reduce pain.

Used in the right situation, maybe we could tap into this to overcome the pains of racing and run faster. Just be careful. You don’t want to upset parents of young children because you’re flying into the finish line screaming every four letter word in existence. You also don’t want to overdose, as much as you might want to at times.

Be honest with yourself

This article was originally posted by Ryan at the original HillRunner.com Blogs.

Image
Maybe "toughing it out" is worth it if you’re in your goal race

When you’re not feeling the greatest, what do you do? Do you just plow through? Or do you give some serious thought to how you’re feeling and, if you feel necessary, adjust your training? At what point do you switch from just plowing through to adjusting? How long do you give yourself to return to normal training? Until you’re feeling 100%? 90%? 80%? Less?

One commonality I’ve noticed among runners is that we prefer to push through. Runners in general are highly motivated, very persistent individuals. We don’t want to give in, no matter what. That’s normally a good thing but it can be counterproductive if taken too far. I’ve seen runners run through stress fractures, serious illness that required antibiotics and all kinds of other things. Some even take pride in doing these things, even though running through serious issues like these often backfires and requires more time off later. Does that sound like something to be proud of?

If taking a few days off now or replacing a hard day with an easy day will allow you to prevent several days or weeks off later, what’s the obvious choice that should be made?

Next time you find yourself dinged up or ill, be honest with yourself. Sure, we all run through aches or the occasional sore throat or congestion. But ask yourself how bad is this really, will running through it just make it worse? Then answer honestly. Then do the right thing. You know what the right thing is if you’re being honest with yourself.

Note: One of the runners I coach motivated me to write this post I have been thinking about for a while by asking if taking off on a scheduled easy day would pose a problem. My response: "Wise choice. I wish all runners made such wise decisions."

Photo credit: nprpdx, on Flickr

Kinesio tape, how social distress affects physical pain

This article was originally posted by Ryan at the original HillRunner.com Blogs.

Kinesio tape

I’ve written before about how Kinesio tape likely helps athletes.

I think it’s also important to understand how it likely does not help athletes. On that front, we have a study looking at how Kinesio tape affects strength in fatigued muscles. Rugby players but, presumably, fatigued muscles are fatigued muscles. Whether you’re running a race or playing a rugby match, fatigue acts in similar ways.

The results in this case aren’t all that promising:

No statistical differences were found between the taped and un-taped conditions in non-fatigued and fatigued situation as well as in the interaction with fatigue. Therefore, taping the gluteal muscle does not influence the leg explosive strength after fatiguing in healthy rugby players.

I believe the importance here is that we now know a little about how Kinesio tape likely does help and a little about how it likely doesn’t help. It’s important to know where we can expect to see benefit and where we can’t with any tool so we can make sure we are using the tool in the best ways. In this case, use Kinesio tape to reduce pain and aid in recovery. Do not use it to try to beat fatigue.

Social distress and physical pain

Have you ever run a race or a hard workout after getting in an argument with a significant other or good friend? It probably didn’t go well, did it?

Well, we shouldn’t be too surprised:

The current study results indicate that participants’ pre-Cyberball unpleasantness threshold is related to their responsiveness to social distress and that physical pain may be modulated by social events. Further studies are needed to clarify the clinical relevance of these results.

We know that social stress does some of the same things within our brains as physical stress. It shouldn’t be shocking that social stress would lower our threshold of physical pain. That’s what this study seems to confirm.

So next time you have a bad race or workout while dealing with a heavy social situation, cut yourself some slack. It’s possible you are just feeling the effects of that situation. Take care of your personal life and your running will bounce back.

Running “too much” or “too fast” (probably) won’t kill you

This article was originally posted by Ryan at the original HillRunner.com Blogs.

Image

I was thinking of doing what would look more like a typical Monday post today with some content from last week. However, this week, some bad analysis of a study that’s been around for a while began appearing.

You may have seen the headlines: Fast running is as deadly as sitting on couch, scientists find or Too much jogging ‘as bad as no exercise at all’ or Stop that binge jogging! Three times a week is best for you… and too much is as bad as doing nothing

Whoa! Seriously? Sounds like I should reconsider my training routine. Or…maybe not.

Alex Hutchinson did a fine job covering this.

This quote sums things up pretty well:

Yes, the conclusion of the study (that "strenuous" jogging is as bad as being sedentary) is based on two deaths over more than a decade of follow-up. (Thank goodness a third person didn’t die, or public health authorities would be banning jogging.)

To summarize, there were simply not enough "fast" or "high frequency" runners to have a statistically significant result. The basic concept here is a fundamental rule of statistics. There is always variability in numbers. There are always random events happening. In order to truly pick up trends, you need a large sample size. If you only sample 10 smokers and 10 non-smokers, you might simply by chance find that both groups have the same number of people who have died from lung cancer. Sample 1000 of each, though, and you’ll start to see a trend where smokers more frequently die of lung cancer.

The same thing is going on here. You had sample sizes of 413 sedentary individuals, 640 who ran less than 1 hour a week but only 50 who ran more than 4 hours a week. If you look at the raw numbers, only 2% of those who ran more than 4 hours a week died in the next decade. A far lower percentage than the sedentary subgroup (though other factors such as age came into play also). However, because there were only 50 individuals, you didn’t have a statistically significant result.

Somehow the media spins "not statistically significant" into "running a lot is as dangerous as not running at all". That’s not at all what this study suggests. It just suggests there isn’t enough information to be sure the results mean anything.

So don’t fear the headlines. Understand what this data really says. We simply don’t know what the numbers would look like with a larger sample size.

Scroll to Top