Low carb, high fat (LCHF) diets and the runner

This article was originally posted by Ryan at the original HillRunner.com Blogs.

Image

A little over a year ago, a coworker asked me for some advice. He was struggling with his long runs in preparation for the Boston marathon. We talked through things and all seemed fine. Then he mentioned that he had been trying the Paleo diet. While he had lost weight and was handling shorter runs at relatively low intensity well, he just couldn’t sustain for his long runs.

Low carb, high fat (LCHF) is the latest trend in the diet world. Interestingly, it has not just your typical snake oil salesmen pushing it but it has some high profile names, most notably Tim Noakes (of Lore of Running* fame) promoting it. I greatly respect Noakes but, in this case, I couldn’t disagree more.

The idea behind LCHF is that it’s the way our ancient ancestors ate. This is very likely true. Study evolutionary biology and it’s pretty clear that one of the key points of differentiation between our ancient ancestors and other primates was our diet. We hunted animals and ate meat and fatty tissue, not just roughage. However, research suggests that these early ancestors also foraged. They had a balanced diet of both meat and plant-based foods.

Further, modern distance runners competing in events of the marathon distance or shorter aren’t persistence hunters. Persistence hunters would run/walk long durations at relatively slow paces to keep animals moving, with only occasional surges at faster paces. They weren’t running at a maximal pace for relatively short periods of time. They were running at paces that would allow them to use fat efficiently.

As competitive distance runners, on the other hand, even if we train our bodies to burn fat as quickly as possible, we’re not going to be able to sustain 5K pace or even marathon pace. We need glycogen stores to accomplish that. We’re different athletes performing different tasks.

There may be an argument for ultra runners to go LCHF but, for those of us who are running distances of marathon or less, the evidence suggests we’re better off eating quality carbs.

An important note here, though is the word quality. I’m not telling you to eat highly processed foods and drink sugary drinks. Go with the quality carbs. Fruits and vegetables, starchy natural foods, whole grains. Those should be your primary fuel sources. The truth is that these LCHF diets do have some basis in the fact that we do eat a lot of junk carbs and getting those out, in favor of quality calories of any kind but including quality carbs, would benefit all of us.

As for my coworker, I encouraged him to eat more carbs at least in the day or so before his long runs to fuel those efforts. He did so and his long runs got much better. He ran well at the Boston Marathon and, while still limiting his carb intake, seems to be finding a better overall balance.

*Note: In the interest of full disclosure, the link to the book Lore of Running is no longer an Amazon affiliate link, it is now an Amazon Smile link. If you use that link to buy the book, a small portion of the sale will go toward the charity of your choice.

Photo credit: phil.lees, on Flickr

Long time off is over.

This article was originally posted by Ed at the original HillRunner.com Blogs.

Due to a set of circumstances partly out of my control I lost five solid months of training. Coach Ryan has taught me how to make the past, "the past" and look forward. So, I have run seven of the last eight days – I think I am back it! Now of course they have all been about two miles and at a slow 8:00 minute per mile pace – but I am getting out there. I know that in a matter of weeks – things will start coming back nice and strong. Al’s run is so important to me because of Team Hillrunner – I am focused strongly on that race and it is in fall – I have time.

I look forward to posting my furthered success of improvement in the coming weeks and months.

Coaches and placebos, avoiding muscle soreness

This article was originally posted by Ryan at the original HillRunner.com Blogs.

Coaches and placebos

Last year, I asked if the placebo effect is a bad thing. My point then being, if it helps you run faster, I don’t care if it’s placebo or a real effect. It helps you run faster and that’s what matters.

It turns out I’m not alone. Coaches regularly use placebos in order to get performance gains.

Overall, the coaches are optimistic about placebo use in sports. Close to half of them, especially those coaching at higher levels of competition, may use it regularly while achieving positive results.

Personally, I say good. While we don’t want coaches going around lying to their athletes, if they do something for an athlete saying this will help you run faster and the athlete does run faster, is that lying?

After a successful placebo intervention, only 15% of the coaches would administer it again without consulting the athlete.

To me, that’s a good sign. Coaches aren’t lying. They are using the placebo, then saying look at what you accomplished. You did this with the benefit of a placebo. Now, believe in yourself. Use the placebo if you wish because you believe in it but go into your next competition knowing what’s possible.

Avoiding muscle soreness

Alex Hutchinson at the Sweat Science blog has another good one. This time, about how to overcome muscle soreness.

Have you ever experienced the situation where some specific workout simply tore apart your legs and they were really sore for some time after? The next time you do the same workout, though, it’s not so bad. That’s called the "repeated bout effect" and it’s a real thing that can help us avoid soreness. Maybe not in that first workout but, if we use it right, possibly in races.

The secret sauce

This article was originally posted by Ryan at the original HillRunner.com Blogs.

Image

I bet Deena knows this "trick"

It seems like everyone is looking for it. What’s that magical workout that will make you PR at your next race or beat that big rival who you just can’t get ahead of? What’s that one workout that all successful runners do? What’s this or that coach’s or athlete’s go to workout?

I’ll tell you my secret sauce. It’s not mile repeats or progression runs or long runs. It’s not something we do every week for three months. In fact, ask the runners I coach and they will tell you that I don’t even like doing the same workout two weeks in a row.

There’s a reason I don’t like doing the same workout even two weeks in a row. Too many runners see the same workout they just did on the schedule again and they get competitive with themselves. If I did my mile repeats last week in 7:10, I should be better now so I should do them in 7:05 this time. Next week? 7:00. Then I’m under 7:00!

That’s not the secret sauce. That’s a recipe for disaster.

So what is the secret sauce? Simple: consistency. That’s it. If you get out there and follow the plan week after week, month after month, year after year, you’re going to see good things happen. Not every workout will go perfectly and some workouts may even be missed but that doesn’t matter because the key isn’t in any single workout. It’s in doing the workouts, long runs and easy days that are on the plan according to plan the large majority of the time. If you consistently get the plan done with only the occasional misses here and there, you’ll see results.

Yes, it’s true that some planning needs to be made. You need to do the right workouts at the right time. You need to make sure you cover your bases. You need to prioritize the right kinds of workouts. However, those are the details. The big picture is that you need to be doing the work day after day, week after week, month after month. That’s the true secret sauce.

Combat boots vs. running shoes, more evidence that more running is good for you

This article was originally posted by Ryan at the original HillRunner.com Blogs.

One would think asking the following two questions would produce common sense answers. In one case, one might be wrong.

Does running in combat boots make you more likely to sustain an injury than running in running shoes? No. What? Really?

One would expect that running in combat boots would lead to a higher injury rate than running in running shoes, right? Well, the US Army changed from using combat boots to running shoes for PT in 1982. A review of studies was done comparing injury rates during Basic Combat Training (BCT) before and after the 1982 change. The result?

These analyses provided little support for a reduction in injury risk after the switch from boots to running shoes for PT in BCT.

What does this mean? I’m not totally sure but it’s interesting to think that running shoes may be no more useful in avoiding injury than combat boots.

Is more running healthy? Yes. Surprised? Why?

Alex Hutchinson explores the topic again.

I’m with him in that it’s a shame we even have to address this issue. This time, we have a study with the numbers to draw a more fair and accurate conclusion. What does it find? Even at high fitness levels, being more fit definitely decreases your mortality.

Scroll to Top